Sunday, January 5, 2014

The Sherlock Holmes Villain Pitch

It has long been a theory of mine that a great actor at playing Sherlock Holmes is also a great actor at playing the villain. Rathbone had his Sir Guy of Gisbourne among others. Cumberbatch had his Khan. Christopher Lee had Dracula, as did Frank Langella. The commanding presence of Sherlock Holmes has a certain similarity to the arch-villain -- both very good a dramatically explaining an evil plan, the villains just doing it before the crime while Holmes tends to do it after.

And then there's that fondness pasticheurs have for pitting Sherlock Holmes against serial killers. Be it classic Jack the Ripper or some original creation, since Doyle was writing before psychotic serial killers were in vogue, his body of work left a void modern writers just love to fill.

With these two Sherlockian tropes in play for so many years, it was kind of fun after wandering late-to-the-party through four seasons of the TV show Dexter, to see Elementary's Jonny Lee Miller pitted against a serial killer.

Of course, as the Dexter fans out there already know, in this particular case, the serial killer is the good guy. And Jonny Lee Miller is a bad, bad guy. A motivational speaker and head of a serial rape gang. Miller doesn't have quite the same villainous presence as a Rathbone or Lee in Dexter . . . and I have to wonder if that lies a lot in the pitch of his voice for me. So many great Holmes/villain actors have those deep resonating tones, and Miller always seems a bit reedy, especially when he's doing an American like Dexter's Jordan Chase.

With all the analytical tech we mere mortals have at our disposal these days, it's probably only a matter of time before some enterprising Sherlockian uses voice analysis comparisons to pick out the perfect Holmes voice. Able to strike terror into the heart of a criminal and soothe a nervous client, with many other abilities in between, the ideal Sherlock Holmes voice is something really special.

Basil Rathbone stands as one of the great Sherlocks of all time because he was successful both as a movie and radio Holmes . . . the latter being the perfect test of whether or not one can evoke Holmes from voice alone. And while Benedict Cumberbatch has done Cabin Pressure, his character Martin Crieff is hard to pull a Holmes out of, and it's even harder to imagine that we'll get a lot of movie/radio Holmes combos in the modern day. (Fun to imagine Martin Freeman hawking Petri Wine with some announcer who strolled in off the street, as Nigel Bruce once did, though.)

Of course, I could be imagining Martin Freeman's Watson getting married as he is on BBC1 this weekend . . . but this being America, I'm still getting Jonny Lee Miller. And pondering villainy and vocals of Sherlock Holmes. (And whining, when I could do the web thing. Yeah. I know.)

9 comments:

  1. Oh, get off your principled high horse and join the rest of us down here in the muck and mire, groveling and scrambling to be the First on Our Block to see the new episodes. Although it occurred to me earlier today after watching S3Ep2 that I am already 66% of the way through any new "Sherlocks" for quite some time. And you still have all of that to look forward to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know if it's as much a principled high horse or just being finicky about unknown internet channels. And now that "First on the Block" has been awarded, that scramble is long over . . . well, two-thirds over.

      Delete
  2. Oh God, Brad, I need a shoulder to cry on. :-( Last night's episode was HILARIOUS! I practically laughed from start to finish. But I think they've killed the thing.

    BC has read the SH train mysteries on radio. I think they're on YouTube. Very good voice, imo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they're doing that much comedy in episode two, I suspect they're setting the fans up for some serious tragedy in episode three. I'd be very scared about now if I wasn't two episodes behind.

      Delete
    2. And I just remembered their penchant for playing with past Holmes bits . . . and the play "Crucifer of Blood." Uh-oh.

      Delete
  3. Yes, probably E3 will be terribly tragic - but that doesn't fix the problem I have with the first two eps. In TRF he left, a tragic hero, and now comes back as some sort of slapstick character. I'm not down with this "humanising" business.

    Direction and visuals much better on this one, I think, but editing still a bit off.

    Don't know the CoB, but will watch tonight online, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Damn, he gives a good Watson, too.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1Jxl-kCZI0&list=PLNsgMjSpt85XoMP0f75TKeGNqt7Z6Nfl2&index=36

    ReplyDelete
  5. Actually, Holmes's voice in the Canon is described as quick, high, and somewhat strident (CARD, STOC). So it's no wonder I hear Peter Cushing when I read the stories. (BTW, thanks for not referring to Rathbone as the Sheriff of Nottingham -- a common error.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sadly could not watch CoB as I couldn't find a stream that didn't require me to download a new client which I refuse to do. Also Charlton Heston? *cringes* Cannot watch Charlton Heston. Gives me hives.

    ReplyDelete